Molly Vevers in ROSS & RACHEL. Photo by Alex Brenner. |
Sometimes,
unfortunately, the whole actually may be worth less than its parts. And that is the case, I fear, with Ross & Rachel, currently enjoying
its US premiere at 59E59 Theaters on East 59th Street in midtown Manhattan, a
year after its critically acclaimed production at the Edinburgh Fringe. To be sure, the play by James Fritz is exceptionally
well written – a terrific monologue or, rather, a finely executed dialogue
between a long married husband and wife, with a single actor speaking for them
both. Moreover, both the play’s direction and its staging are first rate. And, perhaps most important, Molly Vevers’
bravura performance in this one woman tour de force really is something to
write home about.
And
yet, notwithstanding all that, the play left me dissatisfied and I would be
loath to recommend it.
The
play’s title is, of course, a direct allusion to Ross Geller and Rachel Green, the
two prominent characters in Friends, the
long-running television sitcom, (endearingly played by David Schwimmer and
Jeniffer Ansiton). In the TV sitcom,
Ross (the nerd) and Rachel (the high school prom queen) were the on again off
again friends clearly destined to become a loving couple. But then what?
In
Fritz’s play, TV’s Ross and Rachel are never mentioned but the play’s title,
scattered allusions to incidents in the sitcom, and the personae played by
Molly Vevers (she is a beautiful woman and her husband a nerdy college
professor) are enough to make Fritz’s intention clear: it is to question
whether story book endings really are likely in real life or whether
flirtations, boredom, illness and death are more likely to take their toll on
any romantic relationship.
Without
disclosing too much about the play’s plot and denouement, suffice it to say
that it all was a bit too much of a downer for my taste and even a bit
macabre. Yes, it was all done very well
– but to what end?.
No comments:
Post a Comment