The Anthem, currently being
staged at Culture Project’s Lynn Redgrave Theater on Bleecker Street in lower
Manhattan, is an exquisitely stylized show.
The ultra-modern set, with its multitude of video screens and strobe
lighting, is worthy of a Broadway production.
Futuristic costumes, intended to suggest what life might be like several
centuries hence in some totalitarian dystopia, are just terrific. Best of all is the play’s choreography,
ranging from sensual dance to clip-clopping regimental marches and from cool
roller-blading to the most extraordinary gymnastic, acrobatic and aerial feats. The net result is that this is one hell of a
show, a staged circus that I found to be immensely entertaining.
So
much for the good news.
Now
here’s the bad news.
While
this original musical (with book by Gary Morgenstein, music by Jonnie Rockwell
and lyrics by Erik Ransom) is being presented as “a radical retelling of Ayn
Rand’s classic novella,” if truth be told, it likely would make Rand turn over
in her grave. Presumably inspired by Anthem, originally published by Rand in
1938, The Anthem cherry-picks
phrases from the corpus of Rand’s work in a vain attempt at establishing some
sort of identification with one of the Twentieth Century’s most polarizing and
influential novelists and philosophers; it conflates Rand’s Objectivism with anarchy
(which Rand abhorred); and it engages in the worst sort of ethically
relativistic rationalizations which would have been anathema to Rand who tended
to see things in terms of black and white.
Rand’s
original novella falls into the literary genre of
dystopic science fiction, as does George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave
New World. But from a literary standpoint, it is clearly not in a
class with either of those works. The world depicted in Anthem is preposterous, its characters are
two-dimensional, and it is delivered in such sophomoric fashion as to make it
difficult to take seriously. All of which means that I wouldn’t recommend
reading Anthem for its literary value.
On the other hand, Anthem
is worth reading for its historical value in providing Ayn Rand fans and
students of her work with a window into the evolution of both her literary
style and her Objectivist philosophy. In Anthem, one will find the seeds that eventually blossomed into Rand’s magnum opus, Atlas Shrugged: Equality 7-2521 is
clearly the precursor to Atlas Shrugged’s
John Galt; Equality is a street sweeper who discovers an abandoned subway
tunnel whereas Galt is a railroad track walker; Equality’s rediscovery of
electricity foreshadows Galt’s invention of a machine that will change the
world; Equality’s retreat to a sanctuary in the Uncharted Forest, whence he
will embark on the creation of a new individualistic world, presages the
creation of Galt’s Gulch in Atlas
Shrugged; and on and on. And Atlas
Shrugged is such an important book in its own right, that that alone makes Anthem worth reading.
Anthem is set
in a post-apocalyptic, futuristic dystopia in which much of the world’s
knowledge has been lost (torches and candles, for example, are required to
provide light and power since all knowledge of electricity is gone). The
society is so collectivistic and anti-individualistic that even personal
pronouns have been banned in human discourse (individuals refer to themselves
as “we,” never as “I”). Individual initiative is not merely discouraged
but is prohibited and punished. Inventions and discoveries are deemed to
be less than valueless – they are outright evil – unless they are created
collectively.
But one man, Equality 7-2521,
somehow manages to break free of the collectivist society’s bonds. He
comes to see the light – both figuratively and literally – as he re-discovers
electricity, finds a kindred spirit in his lover, Liberty 5-3000 and, with her,
sets out to re-make the world into a free utopian individualistic paradise
where “ego” is no longer a dirty word but the most sacred word of all.
And yet, while the
world depicted in Anthem is a
preposterous one, populated with cardboard characters, it at least exhibited
the virtue of consistency. Not so with The Anthem.
Equality 7-2521 becomes Prometheus (Jason Gotay) in The Anthem but here he’s less a seeker
after liberty and individuality than an adolescent rebel without a cause. His lover, Liberty 5-3000, becomes Athena (Ashley
Kate Adams), the beautiful leader of a back-to-nature rebel band hiding in a
forest. The society is not one in which
most knowledge – including that of electricity – has been lost. On the contrary, it is very technologically
advanced with the whereabouts of all of its citizens continually monitored on a
universal electronic grid. Yet for some unexplainable
reason, light bulbs no longer exist and it is that – the re-discovery of a
light bulb rather than the principles of electricity – that Prometheus stakes
out as his claim to fame!
In sum, The Anthem is a
mash-up of a play that makes no logical sense and that bears little
relationship to Rand’s Objectivist philosophy, let alone the original novella
that presumably inspired it. Go see this
show by all means - for its brilliant set, its terrific costumes and, most of all,
for its truly outstanding choreography.
Just don’t expect a rationally coherent story line, nor anything even
remotely based on Rand’s novella or philosophy.
No comments:
Post a Comment