Kirk Gostkowski and Ashleigh Murray in SOME GIRL(S). Photo by Olivia Nolan. |
Variations
Theatre Group (VTG) is closing out its fourth season with a bang – a wonderful
revival of Neil LaBute’s Some Girl(s)
at the Chain Theatre in Long Island City.
That, of course, came to me as no surprise: back in 2009-10, VTG’s initial
production of another Neil LaBute play, The
Shape of Things, starring Kirk Gostkowski and directed by Rich Ferraioli
(VTG’s co-founders and co-Artistic Directors), blew me away. And VTG’s subsequent revivals of Sam Shepard’s
Fool for Love and Arthur Miller’s After the Fall (both also directed by
Ferraioli and starring Gostkowski) were equally impressive. So with Gostkowski
starring in Some Girl(s) and Farraioli
producing (even if not directing this one), my expectations were understandably
high. And I was not disappointed.
What
did surprise me though is that, despite the consistent excellence of its
productions, VTG remains one of the best kept theatrical secrets in the New
York area. Indeed, at the performance of
Some Girl(s) that I attended, there
were fewer occupied seats than empty ones.
Maybe parochial Manhattan theatre goers are simply reluctant to make the
short hop across the river into Long Island City, even for the best of reasons (I
know I was at first) and, if so, that is unfortunately their loss.
The
story line of Some Girl(s) is simple
and direct: Guy (Kirk Gostkowski), a successful teacher and aspiring writer,
has just gotten engaged but, before getting married, he has decided to look up
his ex-girlfriends and attempt to make amends to them for any injuries he might
have caused them in their earlier relationships. To that end, he arranges to meet each of them
in a hotel room in her home town. The
ex-girlfriends are a predictable lot and the manner of Guy’s prior use, abuse and/or
abandonment of them turns out to have been similarly unsurprising.
Sam (Amber Bogdewiecz) was Guy’s Seattle high
school sweetheart who he dumped just before the prom. Tyler (Ashleigh Murray) was his sexually
adventurous partner in Chicago. Lindsay
(Kathryn Neville Brown) was the older married college professor with whom he
took up as a graduate student in Boston.
And Bobbi (Jill Durso) may have been the only woman he ever truly loved (although
maybe that was really her twin sister, Billi, that he loved after all). Of course he had assured each and every one
of them that she was “the one” and perhaps he even meant it at the time he said
it but, what really comes across is that, to Guy, women are a pretty fungible
commodity and his own hedonist selfishness is so extreme that their feelings
never even enter into his considerations.
Each of Guy’s exes, in her own way, does an
exceptional job of expressing her ambivalent attitudes toward her former
lover. Sam has married, has become a
mother, and has gotten on with her life, but her nuanced performance suggests
that the damage Guy did to her never fully healed. Tyler exudes sexuality but she uses her sex
as a scalpel, as if to suggest to Guy just what he might have lost by
abandoning her. Lindsay, who may be the
most unforgiving of the lot, uses her sex to torment Guy as well, but more as a
sledge than a scalpel. And it is Bobbi who
succeeds in torturing him with words, rather than her sexuality, who brings
about his ultimate denouement – if, indeed, that is what it is.
But why has Guy acted so out of character in
seeking to atone for his past sins?
Well, as it turns out, there may have been more to his apparently
aberrant behavior than first met the eye.
The play is set in a series of nearly
identical hotel rooms in Seattle, Chicago, Boston and Los Angeles, the only
characteristics distinguishing one room from another being the different paintings
on the walls, all having been created by Stephanie Ferraioli (the show’s Scenic
Artist and Rich Ferraioli’s wife). The interchangability
of the rooms (other than for the paintings) sharply underscores the fungibility
of the women in Guy’s life as he perceives them.
When LaBute first wrote this play, those were
all of the characters in it but, sometime after it was first produced, he
decided that something was missing and added another scene with one more
character, Reggie, the kid sister of Guy’s childhood friend. The scene with
Reggie is an add-on – the play can be performed with or without it – but LaBute
has suggested that a “daring” theatre company might attempt it. Since VTG’s “goal is to produce
intellectually engaging, muscular theatre” and since it defines “muscular
theatre” as “strong, visceral language that elicits from the audience the
experience of live raw emotion,” it is not surprising that it opted to include
the add-on scene with the Reggie character (Jaclyn Sokol).
Personally, I would have preferred if that
character and scene had been omitted. I
found Guy’s past relationship to the twelve-year-old Reggie to be gratuitously
jarring and disturbing and one that was not at all necessary for our
understanding of Guy’s persona as an adult.
But that is not to be taken as a criticism of Sokol’s performance in any
way: indeed, I thought that the emotional depth of her performance was
extraordinary. I just would have
preferred if LaBute had never written her role into the play in the first place
or, given that he did, if VTG had chosen to produce the play without that
add-on scene.
But that is a minor quibble. Overall this is an excellent production,
right up there with the rest of VTG’s shows.
It’s well worth a trip across the river.
I'm a friend (and fan of) Labute AND Kathy Browne. I hope to see Kathy next wed. Cool article.
ReplyDelete